Engagement Evaluation
The Engagement Evaluation is an informal survey/assessment, designed to be used after meetings or engagements with users, but not necessarily after each engagement. There are two pieces to the evaluation below:
- general information, which could mostly be provided by the facilitator
- a series of interview questions, which could be administered to the researcher in person or via a survey tool
Depending on the goal of this evaluation, these pieces can be mixed and matched in order to:
- track specific users and/or projects in a standardized manner
- obtain feedback on facilitation interactions in order to adjust and improve future interaction
- understand the impact of ACI-REF interactions
Engagement Information
- 
    Name/UserID 
- 
    Dept 
- 
    PI/group 
- 
    Facilitator 
- 
    Date (range) of Interaction 
- 
    Reason for contact - 
        __ Help with grant proposal 
- 
        __ Help via ticketing system (for items not listed here) 
- 
        __ Have ACI-REF speak at lab/group meeting (or research gathering) 
- 
        __ Discuss Sstorage options 
- 
        __ Discuss compute options 
- 
        __ Use an high-performance or high-throughput system (cluster) 
- 
        __ Use one or more software packages 
- 
        __ Install software 
- 
        __ Scale a functioning program to HPC/HTC 
- 
        __ Optimize/troubleshoot a workflow 
- 
        __ Develop or adopt a workflow 
- 
        __ Other _________________________ 
 
- 
        
- 
    Rate engagement (1-5 scale) 
Engagement Interview
Give a 3 sentence description of your research
Describe how ACI resources are a critical component of your research
What progress have you made?
What roadblocks have you had?
Describe what would or would not have been possible without the help of an ACI-REF (e.g. save XX amount of time, started a new line of research, etc).:
Please list any publications that were accelerated or improved from the help of an ACI-REF:
Did you use the skills & expertise you gained from the ACI-REF to assist or train others?
- Other grad students? ____ Yes ____ No
- Other post-docs? ____ Yes ____ No
- Other faculty? ____ Yes ____ No
Any suggestions for how we can improve our interactions/(relationship)/collaboration?